• Mon. May 20th, 2024

The West must take Putin’s threat to deploy nuclear weapons seriously as tensions escalate


Oct 13, 2022

The House Live All Liz Truss's commitment to Ukraine on the front line must also extend to refugees on the home front By Luke Tryl Communities The Foreign Secretary must act fast to tackle the crisis in UK aid transparency By Hilary Benn MP Foreign affairs We must boost defence spending to meet dangerous new threats By Tobias Ellwood MP Defence Savage cuts to the BBC World Service make a mockery of Global Britain By Lord Alton Culture In an increasingly volatile world, Britain must put security and resilience front and centre By Alicia Kearns MP Defence Press releases LEAD, UK ADVERTISING INDUSTRY’S SUMMIT, RETURNS FOR 2023 By Advertising Association Shadow Veterans Minister meets veterans' charity chief By Veterans Aid New DIT Great Global Trade Campaign Ad Kicks Off UK’s Cannes Lions 2022 By Advertising Association The West must take Putin’s threat to deploy nuclear weapons seriously as tensions escalate


Robert Jenrick MP


4 min read

Vladimir Putin’s war continues to go from bad to worse. Buoyed by the stunning advances made in the Kharkiv region in early September, Ukraine’s counter-offensive is progressing deeper into Russian-occupied territory.

In the east, Ukraine has recaptured the important logistics hub, Lyman, in a major setback to Russia’s attempt to control the Donbas, and in the south Ukraine is making steady progress to liberate the key port city, Kherson. The daring attack on the Kerch bridge has severed Moscow’s main artery to their forces on the southern front and inflicted an embarrassing blow to Putin’s carefully cultivated image as a strongman defending the Russian homeland from adversaries. With Ukraine in the ascendancy, no part of Russian-occupied Ukraine appears safe.

Putin’s attempts to wrestle back the momentum on the battlefield have proved ineffective

Putin’s attempts to wrestle back the momentum on the battlefield have proved ineffective. The announcement of partial mobilisation on 21 September was met with demonstrations across the country and an exodus of an estimated 400,000 fighting-age men from Russia. In the latest sign that Putin’s chaotic mobilisation efforts are faltering, Russia is now leaning on Belarus to supplement its supply of troops with a joint ground force. More problematically for the Kremlin, cobbling together civilians to send to the front line will not correct the fundamental asymmetry between the motivation, training and logistic networks of the Ukrainian and Russian forces.

In an admission there have been serious failures in military leadership, Putin has appointed General Sergei Surovikin as the new overall commander of the Kremlin’s forces in Ukraine. The former commander-in-chief of the Russian aerospace forces in Syria, Surovikin has so far employed the same strategy of indiscriminate missile attacks in Ukraine. Over the weekend we saw strikes on energy and transport infrastructure interspersed with hits on office blocks, apartment buildings and even a children’s playground, in what was clearly an attempt to inflict maximum damage on civilians and terrorise the Ukrainian people into submission.

Yet this show of force belies the fragility at the heart of Russia’s approach. These strikes do nothing to advance Russia’s position on the battlefield. And the fact that Russia has not deployed this rate of long-range cruise missiles since the start of the war suggests that supplies of these projectiles are limited and the intensity of current bombardment cannot be sustained. The Kremlin’s brutality has only welded the Ukrainian people together through a stronger sense of Ukrainian nationhood and an even greater resolve to liberate their land.

Ukraine’s sustained military advances raise the stakes considerably for Putin. Within Russia he is under increasing pressure from hardliners to escalate the conflict, including by potentially deploying tactical nuclear weapons. Whilst such an outcome remains unlikely, not least because it is emphatically not in Putin’s self-interest to do so, it would be prudent for decision makers to take this threat seriously. Putin has already broken one massive taboo – and he has proven that he is not bound by moral constraints. A constructive debate about our response can improve our posture to the overall betterment of deterrence.

Meanwhile the fighting will continue. Russia is beset with manpower and equipment shortages, but Putin is too invested in the conflict to cease hostilities at this moment. Ukraine cannot, and will not, submit to a murderous regime that has invaded its territory and is committing unspeakable atrocities against its population. Russia may well repeat their bombardment of civilian infrastructure in an attempt to force Ukraine to capitulate, but with Ukraine claiming to have shot down over half of their missiles launched, and with improved defensive systems scheduled to be in place by November, this is unlikely to translate into decisive gains on the battlefield.

For the United Kingdom and our allies, the priority must now be to press ahead with the delivery and coordination of these air defence systems to protect Ukraine’s population centres and critical infrastructure ahead of a difficult winter.

Robert Jenrick, Conservative MP for Newark and chair of Conservative Friends of Ukraine.

Related Why A Post-Brexit Trade Deal With The US Was Never Realistic By Adam Payne

PoliticsHome Newsletters

Get the inside track on what MPs and Peers are talking about. Sign up to The House's morning email for the latest insight and reaction from Parliamentarians, policy-makers and organisations.


Engineering a Better World

The Engineering a Better World podcast series from The House magazine and the IET is back for series two! New host Jonn Elledge discusses with parliamentarians and industry experts how technology and engineering can provide policy solutions to our changing world.

NEW SERIES – Listen now

Read next Communities Plan To Double Ukraine Refugee Support Payments To £700 Has Been Shelved