A PETITION for Oxfordshire County Council to pull out of pension investments in fossil fuel companies has attracted more than 500 signatures – having been started by one of its own employees.
Kate Robinson said she was ‘deeply ashamed and quite frankly alarmed’ that companies such as Shell form part of the council’s portfolio.
Introducing herself as an employee of 17 years with a stake in the local government pension fund throughout, she said: “I am generally very proud to be an employee of Oxfordshire County Council and feel very motivated to push towards its priorities, including putting climate action at the heart of our work and the ambition for Oxfordshire to reach net zero by 2030.
READ MORE: £68k raised for martial arts charity inspired by young girls attempt on her life
“However, when I look at our pension fund, I am deeply ashamed and quite frankly alarmed by the fact that the Brunel portfolio includes fossil fuel companies such as Dutch company Shell.
“Although professing to be looking at the roadmap to renewables, Shell continues with its large programme of expansion and extraction, which includes recent exploration of the coasts of Namibia and South Africa.
“This behaviour directly contradicts the scientific evidence which shows we need to leave at least two thirds of known fossil fuels in the ground if we are to keep global warming within the safe level of temperature rise, 1.5 degrees.
“The thought that my money is being invested into these companies is deeply concerning to me.
“The irony has not been lost on me that our organisation has signposted to Climate Action Oxfordshire’s website to change our own personal behaviours, at home and at work.
READ MORE: East Oxford MP responds to claims she has been 'absent' on LTN issue
“We are encouraged to insulate our homes, turn down our thermostats, use active travel and change to a plant-based diet. They also tell us to choose ethical pensions, banking and investments.”
Councillor David Bartholomew twice sought to question the validity of the petition.
Quoting procedural rule 10.1.1 – any person other than a member of the council may present a petition at a council meeting – Cllr Bartholomew asked: “Was that last petition therefore legitimate or not?”
Council chair Councillor Susanna Pressel replied: “She is not a member of council, she is a member of staff. Councillors are members of council, not the staff.”
Two more public addresses were before Mr Bartholomew returned to the issue, this time quoting paragraph 22 of the officers’ code of conduct, which includes: “If you wish to protest against council policy you must not use the council’s headed notepaper, work time or council facilities to do so.”
READ MORE: Oxfordshire's MMR jab coverage behind target
Mr Bartholomew said: “That clearly states an officer must not use council facilities to protest against council policy, so that was wrong.”
–
A message from our Editor
Thank you for reading this story and supporting the Oxford Mail.
If you like what we do please consider getting a subscription for the Oxford Mail and in return we’ll give you unrestricted access with less adverts across our website from the latest news, investigations, features, and sport.
Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Tik Tok for more.
You can also join the conversation in our Facebook groups: stay ahead of traffic alerts here, keep up to date with the latest from court here, share your favourite memories of Oxford here, get your daily dose of celebrity news here and take some time out with news that will make you smile.
If you’ve got a story for our reporters, send us your news here. You can also list an event for free here.